Honda Silver Wing Scooter Forum

Welcome to the home for Honda SilverWing and everyone interested. This is a place to ask questions, share, and learn about the SilverWing and its dedicated riders. Please post an introduction when you join as a sign of Courtesy.
 
HomeCalendarGalleryFAQSearchRegisterLog in
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
» Buffeting - please define?
by cotetoi Today at 22:22

» New Swing owner in South Wales
by phils a winger Today at 17:34

» New possible swing owner
by siataukreg Today at 12:12

» Front Bouncy
by gavinfdavies Today at 07:37

» Introduction
by gavinfdavies Today at 07:01

» 2002 Honda Reflex 250cc ABS
by cliffyk Yesterday at 11:30

» Air Shocks
by Pastor Ron Yesterday at 11:10

» shop Manual
by MadDog Yesterday at 10:45

» Reply to Post is lost
by Easyrider Fri 20 Oct 2017, 15:10

» A bit windy
by steve_h80 Thu 19 Oct 2017, 15:23

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
free forum
 
Share | 
 

 Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
oldwingguy
Silver Wing Expert
Silver Wing Expert


Number of posts : 617
Location : Hocking Hills U.S.A.
Points : 1303
Registration date : 2016-01-29

PostSubject: Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.   Tue 12 Apr 2016, 14:10

Move aside, Breathalyzer. Police in New York may soon be equipped with a "Textalyzer," a device that can determine if a driver involved in a crash was driving while texting.
New York Senator Terrence Murphy and Assembly Assistant Speaker Felix Ortiz have partnered with Distracted Operators Risk Casualties, an awareness organization, to propose a bill that would allow authorities to examine phones at an accident site.
The Textalyzer purportedly does not provide police with any content on the phone — conversations, contacts, photos, etc.
"I have often heard there is no such thing as a breathalyzer for distracted driving — so we created one," Ben Lieberman, co-founder of DORC, said in a statement. "Respecting drivers' personal privacy, however, is also important, and we are taking meticulous steps to not violate those rights."
Back to top Go down
Kenjj50
Super Scooter Rider
Super Scooter Rider


Number of posts : 218
Age : 67
Location : Naperville, Illinois
Points : 993
Registration date : 2015-09-28

PostSubject: Re: Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.   Tue 12 Apr 2016, 14:19

Great idea! I hope it's adopted and applied vigorously by the NY cops. If it gets to Chicago and environs I will feel marginally safer. Of course, in Chicago, you have about an equal chance of being shot by the police whether you are the perpetrator or the victim! Probably best to avoid the accident and any contact with local law enforcement!
Back to top Go down
Old Limey
Silver Wing Expert
Silver Wing Expert
avatar

Number of posts : 774
Age : 73
Location : BOLTON LANCASHIRE ENGLAND
Points : 3526
Registration date : 2010-06-09

PostSubject: Re: Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.   Tue 12 Apr 2016, 14:33

It has long been against the law in UK to use a "cell" or as we call it a mobile phone whilst driving. Aparrently they can tell from the drivers call history when the last call was made.
Back to top Go down
Thebreen
Scooter Rider
Scooter Rider


Number of posts : 63
Age : 55
Location : Space Coast, Florida
Points : 2304
Registration date : 2011-09-15

PostSubject: Re: Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.   Wed 13 Apr 2016, 11:44

oldwingguy wrote:
Move aside, Breathalyzer. Police in New York may soon be equipped with a "Textalyzer," a device that can determine if a driver involved in a crash was driving while texting.
New York Senator Terrence Murphy and Assembly Assistant Speaker Felix Ortiz have partnered with Distracted Operators Risk Casualties, an awareness organization, to propose a bill that would allow authorities to examine phones at an accident site.
The Textalyzer purportedly does not provide police with any content on the phone — conversations, contacts, photos, etc.
"I have often heard there is no such thing as a breathalyzer for distracted driving — so we created one," Ben Lieberman, co-founder of DORC, said in a statement. "Respecting drivers' personal privacy, however, is also important, and we are taking meticulous steps to not violate those rights."

haw haw

DORC (pronounced Dork) - seriously sounds like they would/could use the legality of "probable cause" ie probably was distracted so had an accident - a little too late if you ask me...what if the person had a lock enabled on their phone? FBI had to pay hackers $$$$ to crack that terrorists phone....makes me want to arm myself with a paint gun - just tag their vehicle a couple of times What a Face
Back to top Go down
hankster
Maxi-Scooter Rider
Maxi-Scooter Rider


Number of posts : 140
Age : 65
Location : Fort Myers FL
Points : 881
Registration date : 2015-11-14

PostSubject: Re: Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.   Wed 13 Apr 2016, 16:22

IMHO it's overkill. That info is already available through phone company records. Of course that requires a warrant to get. I didn't read the bill but it sounds like they want to be able to search the phone without a warrant.
Back to top Go down
bandito2
Maxi-Scooter Rider
Maxi-Scooter Rider


Number of posts : 156
Location : Outside of the box
Points : 2932
Registration date : 2010-04-04

PostSubject: Re: Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.   Wed 13 Apr 2016, 19:12

Might be a good idea, but as hankster said... the info should be available through phone records obtainable with a warrant. Even then that may not be good enough for prosecutorial reasons since it would not conclusively implicate the driver that happens to have a cell phone in his vehicle at the time. Unless somebody gets a picture of the driver with the phone in his or her hand at the time of an accident or a witness claims and states that to be fact under oath, there is no way to actually prove that the phone was a distraction. Just because the phone may have been on, that in and of itself could legally be argued to not be conclusive proof of distraction. It could have been used by others in the vehicle at the time, on while streaming, hands free or being used as gps or whatever other ways a phone may be on but not a distraction. Of course that would just be my opinion. Law is a sticky thing. They may try to use such a thing in courts, But I've got a feeling it will loose strength the minute it is challenged.

No I don't think they could legally search a phone in any way without a warrant. (In the USA).
Constitutionally, people have the 4th amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Back to top Go down
Kenjj50
Super Scooter Rider
Super Scooter Rider


Number of posts : 218
Age : 67
Location : Naperville, Illinois
Points : 993
Registration date : 2015-09-28

PostSubject: Re: Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.   Thu 14 Apr 2016, 10:34

It doesn't sound like the device used by NY law enforcement will do anything but determine if the phone was in use at the time of the accident. It doesn't read content. It shouldn't require any pass codes or warrants and seemingly violates no one's civil rights. In the US, driving licenses are a privilege, not a right. We agree to obey traffic laws. In most US states using a cell phone while driving is a violation of the law and the driving privilege.
Back to top Go down
 
Hope ahead for us ? I hope so.
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» 'Great White Hope' gets adductor strain
» New Fj'er in Hope Mills. Well almost be there officially 09/01/2011
» Raelene Boyle recalls early athletic memories & her "Hope Sweeneys"
» Hope all our brothers & sisters in the Louisville, KY area are okay!
» Hope Solo Busted? True or False

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Honda Silver Wing Scooter Forum :: General :: General Chat-
Jump to: